LACityFFengineCo287 Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 When I was helping someone, I believe I gave someone in this forum my email over a p.m, nice job trying to hack me, you failed miserably. Now you will fall into my wrath when I find you ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoppah Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 If you can prove he tried to hack you, please contact me or Stan by PM and give us the username. We will track his IP and contact his ISP (we have done that before), because hacking is punishable by law and not tolerated on this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joachimnor Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 it is actually an international crime, just like shooting civillians in a war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzyface Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 What gets me is quitters on XBL.Laughably, I was winning a game on fifa 10 3-0, and as the guy quit i sent a message saying "I'm sorry" and offering a hug.He came back with, 'i was battering you'.People's logic confuses me sometimes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick the greek Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 it is actually an international crime, just like shooting civillians in a warLet me guess. Response to US marines or Blackwater's killers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joachimnor Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 response to the so called "war" against terror but back to topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoppah Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 just like shooting civillians in a warNice comparison, seems like you know exactly what you're talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joachimnor Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 hahahaha, geneva convention xP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick the greek Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 response to the so called "war" against terror but back to topicLast off topic message. The so called "war against terror" is a war being made in the name of money and stupidity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forensics Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 It's a bit of a oxymoron "war against terror". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Posted December 2, 2009 Report Share Posted December 2, 2009 I smell a discussion starting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joachimnor Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 The war against terror is not a legal war and can by that not be called a war... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ami89E1234 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 yet 43 odd countries support and continue it guess mankind is just as retarded as usual Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundking Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Well here's the thing, if you are a big country with lots of guns, and you have 42 others doing the same as you, it doesn't matter if others approve, because you can blow them up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usmc123 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 The war against terror is not a legal war and can by that not be called a war...So what is legal? Mass murdering Kurds? Hitting a building with two jumbo jets? Running a government in Afghanistan that is completely tyrannical? Your so right, we should of just watched the world destroy itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erfd Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 So what is legal? Mass murdering Kurds? Hitting a building with two jumbo jets? Running a government in Afghanistan that is completely tyrannical? Your so right, we should of just watched the world destroy itself.I know right, and since our president is sending 30 thousand troops over and saying when they will leave, its just telling the terrorist to lay low and wait a few years to attack AGAIN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usmc123 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I know right, and since our president is sending 30 thousand troops over and saying when they will leave, its just telling the terrorist to lay low and wait a few years to attack AGAIN.We are not going to be out of Afghanistan by 2011, unless support for the war hits an all time low and Obama starts getting nervous about re-election. We are going to be there probably until 2013 with a significant troop presence. However, I'm worried about how the media and the Dems will feel, this war will be tough. The Taliban are not 18 year olds from Syria and Saudi Arabia looking to plant some bombs on roads. They are fighters with experience fighting the dominant fighting force, but we are a military that knows how to fight an army that fights face to face instead of via a cell phone on an IED frequency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xplorer4x4 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 yet 43 odd countries support and continue it guess mankind is just as retarded as usualSo just because mass majority does something, its right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzyface Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Xplorer, I don't think Ami89 was suggesting it was right (given the word 'retarded')...Ultimately, I don't ever see there being an end to this. It's almost a counter productive loop.Yes, the initial goal was to find Bin Laden, then out of nowhere Iraq are thrown into the light via a voted for law, stating they had to let inspectors in or face consequences.They let inspectors in, who found nothing and realised they dropped a b*****k, so suddenly a change in leaders becomes the forefront reason (something that G.W Bush inherited as a POLICY when he took over)Now I am in no way, supportive of the taliban etc, but they DO have a point in that it is not the 'United Forces' land to currently be sat on. They did what they wanted by overthrowing Saddam, so we should have all got the hell out of there after.Unfortunately, the longer we stay, and the more of them we kill, the more of them get hired to 'force out' the 'opressor'.Everything is already corrupted there already, for example the Police officer in 'training' out there who shot the british troops as they had lunch with an ak47.We should just pull everyone out, no care for face saving now when there's no face left, it's peoples lives at risk.If Obama, Brown, Sarkozy(sp?) and everyone else want a presence in the Eastern Countries, they should go there themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xplorer4x4 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Xplorer, I don't think Ami89 was suggesting it was right (given the word 'retarded)Perhaps, some times its hard to tell with text on a screen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzyface Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Perhaps, some times its hard to tell with text on a screen.It's okay, I was only saying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joachimnor Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 So what is legal? Mass murdering Kurds? Hitting a building with two jumbo jets? Running a government in Afghanistan that is completely tyrannical? Your so right, we should of just watched the world destroy itself.To be a legal war it have to be approved by the UN Security council and it have to be against a country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usmc123 Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 To be a legal war it have to be approved by the UN Security council and it have to be against a country.I'm aware of what is supposed to be legal, I was just trying to make a point about the war. Besides, didn't the UN approve the invasion of Afghanistan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoppah Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I can't believe people are still discussing about the legality of the invasion in Iraq in 2003. What's the point? You're talking about it as if the invasion still needs to happen. Well, it did happen, so that dissusion is over. It's funny that many NATO countries do actually support the war as many of them did deploy troops in Iraq after the invasion. I do not support that war either, but on the other hand it's actually good there is at least one country willing to do what is necessary against terrorism. It's just impossible to find out the effectiveness of the war on terrorism, but we all know the US never got attacked on its own soil by terrorists anymore. Nobody can tell what would've happened if the invasions in Afghanistan and Iraq never happened, so saying the war on terror is useless is just hypocrisy.The war in Afghanistan is legal, because the US had its rights to defend itself after the attacks on 9/11. It's a bit of a simple thought, but totally understandable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forensics Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 I smell a discussion starting...You were right!You have a very good sense of smell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
